In re Estate of Richard N. Cooper, Deceased, Joe M. Richardson, Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard N. Cooper, Deceased, et al. v. First Tennessee Bank, National Association

275 Neb. 297 (2008) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · March 28, 2008 · No. S-06-1016

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court held that a corporate claimant’s filing of a statement of claim in a probate proceeding did not constitute the unauthorized practice of law because it was an administrative filing rather than the commencement of a legal proceeding. The court also held that an out-of-state attorney’s filing of a demand for notice was not unauthorized practice under Nebraska’s temporary-practice rule because it was reasonably related to the attorney’s Tennessee practice and involved minimal risk. The court reversed the county court’s order striking both filings and remanded with directions to reinstate them.

Holdings

  1. Filing a statement of claim under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2486(1) is an administrative act distinct from commencing a legal proceeding and does not, by itself, constitute the practice of law or require filing by a Nebraska-licensed attorney.
  2. An attorney licensed in another United States jurisdiction may temporarily file a demand for notice in Nebraska when the service arises out of or is reasonably related to the attorney's practice in the jurisdiction where admitted; under these circumstances, the filing did not constitute unauthorized practice of law.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the filing of a statement of claim against a decedent's estate by a corporate claimant's nonlawyer employee constituted the unauthorized practice of law.
  2. Whether the filing of a demand for notice in a probate proceeding by an attorney licensed in another state but not Nebraska constituted the unauthorized practice of law.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (11)

  • In re Trust Created by Hansen, 274 Neb. 199, 739 N.W.2d 170 (2007)(followed)
  • In re Estate of Lamplaugh, 270 Neb. 941, 708 N.W.2d 645 (2006)(followed)
  • Citizens for Eq. Ed. v. Lyons-Decatur Sch. Dist., 274 Neb. 278, 739 N.W.2d 742 (2007)(followed)
  • Summit Pool Supplies, Inc. v. Price, 461 So. 2d 272 (Fla. App. 1985)(followed by analogy)
  • In re Estate of Piper, 59 Ill. App. 3d 325, 375 N.E.2d 477, 16 Ill. Dec. 604 (1978)(followed by analogy)
  • In re Estate of Feuerhalm, 215 Neb. 872, 341 N.W.2d 342 (1983)(followed)
  • Mulinex v. Roberts, 261 Neb. 800, 626 N.W.2d 220 (2001)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Wright v. Barlow, 131 Neb. 294, 268 N.W. 95 (1936)(applied)
  • State ex rel. Hunter v. Kirk, 133 Neb. 625, 276 N.W. 380 (1937)(applied)
  • Spier v. Thomas, 131 Neb. 579, 269 N.W. 61 (1936)(applied)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…