In re Application of Loretta D. Collins for Admission to the Nebraska State Bar

288 Neb. 519 (2014) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · July 11, 2014 · No. No. S-13-1020

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court reviewed de novo the Nebraska State Bar Commission’s denial of Loretta D. Collins’ application for admission without examination based on character and fitness concerns. The court held that her Alabama disciplinary reprimands, financial history, criminal history, and application omissions did not establish that she lacked the requisite present character and fitness for admission. The court granted her Class 1-B application, subject to payment of the mandatory assessment and administration of the oath.

Holdings

  1. The Nebraska Supreme Court reviews an applicant's appeal from a final ruling of the Nebraska State Bar Commission de novo on the record made before the Commission.
  2. The Nebraska Supreme Court has the sole power to admit persons to practice law in Nebraska and to fix qualifications for admission, while administrative responsibility for bar admissions is delegated to the Nebraska State Bar Commission.
  3. An applicant for admission to the Nebraska State Bar bears the burden of proving good character through documentation, reports, and witnesses, and a significant lack of honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, or reliability may justify denial.
  4. A disciplinary reprimand, standing alone, does not establish that a lawyer lacks the character and fitness required to continue practicing law; however, multiple reprimands and the surrounding circumstances may be considered in an admission proceeding.
  5. The Nebraska Supreme Court is not bound by character-and-fitness determinations made by other jurisdictions, but may consider those determinations when assessing an applicant's qualifications for admission to the Nebraska bar.
  6. Collins's omissions and inaccuracies concerning disciplinary complaints, negative credit history, and a criminal fine did not demonstrate reckless behavior that precluded admission.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Collins possessed the present character and fitness required for admission to the Nebraska bar.
  2. Whether Collins's Alabama disciplinary reprimands, financial history, criminal fine, and omissions or inaccuracies on her application demonstrated a lack of candor or other character deficiencies sufficient to deny admission.
  3. What standard of review governs an appeal from a final Nebraska State Bar Commission ruling on an admission application.

Disposition

approved

Cases Cited (2)

  • In re Application of Hartmann, 276 Neb. 775, 757 N.W.2d 355 (2008)(followed)
  • In re Appeal of Lane, 249 Neb. 499, 544 N.W.2d 367 (1996)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…