Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of First Nebraska Educators Credit Union’s amended complaint alleging that U.S. Bank failed to provide notice of a foreclosure sale under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1008. The court held that the credit union was not a party to the foreclosed trust deed and had not adequately filed a separate request for notice complying with the statute.
Holdings
- A person or institution that is not a party to the trust deed being foreclosed is not entitled to notice under § 76-1008(3); such a party must make a valid request under § 76-1008(1).
- First Nebraska did not adequately request notice under § 76-1008(1) because its request failed to identify the senior trust deed with the information required by the statute, including the recording date and book-and-page or computer-system reference.
- The amended complaint failed to state a claim because U.S. Bank had no statutory obligation to provide First Nebraska notice of the foreclosure sale.
Questions Presented
- Whether U.S. Bank was required under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1008 to mail First Nebraska notice of the foreclosure sale.
- Whether the notice request included in First Nebraska's own deed of trust adequately complied with § 76-1008(1) to trigger a statutory notice obligation.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- SID No. 1 v. Adamy, 289 Neb. 913, 858 N.W.2d 168 (2015)(followed)
- Hauxwell v. Henning, 291 Neb. 1, 863 N.W.2d 798 (2015)(followed)
- First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Davey, 285 Neb. 835, 830 N.W.2d 63 (2013)(followed)
- DMK Biodiesel v. McCoy, 290 Neb. 286, 859 N.W.2d 867 (2015)(followed)
- Stick v. City of Omaha, 289 Neb. 752, 857 N.W.2d 561 (2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…