Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court held that orders imposing discovery sanctions and denying a motion to vacate those sanctions were not final orders subject to separate interlocutory appeal. The court concluded it had jurisdiction to review the orders on appeal from the final judgment but affirmed because the appellant failed to provide a record supporting his claims regarding notice and procedural due process.
Holdings
- The discovery-sanctions order and the order denying Wiekhorst's motion to vacate were not final orders under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1902. The sanctions order was an interlocutory discovery ruling, and the order denying vacation did not independently affect a substantial right; therefore, Wiekhorst properly appealed from the final judgment.
- The court affirmed because Wiekhorst failed to present a record establishing that he lacked notice of the relevant hearings or that the district court otherwise erred. In the absence of proof to the contrary, the authenticated trial-court journal entry stating that proper notice was given controlled, and the incomplete bill of exceptions could not support reversal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Nebraska Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the district court's order denying Wiekhorst's motion to vacate the discovery-sanctions order.
- Whether the district court erred in denying Wiekhorst's motion to vacate the sanctions order based on alleged lack of timely notice and procedural due process.
- Whether the appellate record supported Wiekhorst's assigned error.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Guardian Tax Partners v. Skrupa Invest. Co., 295 Neb. 639, 889 N.W.2d 825 (2017)(followed)
- Obad v. State, 277 Neb. 866, 766 N.W.2d 89 (2009)(followed)
- Deines v. Essex Corp., 293 Neb. 577, 879 N.W.2d 30 (2016)(followed)
- In re Adoption of Madysen S. et al., 293 Neb. 646, 879 N.W.2d 34 (2016)(followed)
- Big John’s Billiards v. State, 283 Neb. 496, 811 N.W.2d 205 (2012)(followed)
- Furstenfeld v. Pepin, 287 Neb. 12, 840 N.W.2d 862 (2013)(followed)
- Cattle Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Watson, 293 Neb. 943, 880 N.W.2d 906 (2016)(followed)
- State v. Deckard, 272 Neb. 410, 722 N.W.2d 55 (2006)(followed)
- Alder v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 241 Neb. 873, 491 N.W.2d 686 (1992)(followed)
- Pierce v. Landmark Mgmt. Group, 293 Neb. 890, 880 N.W.2d 885 (2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…