Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court reviewed a dissolution action involving the effect of a prior legal separation decree on an award of alimony and attorney fees. The court held that Valerie Connolly was not required to show a change in circumstances to receive alimony in the subsequent dissolution decree, but affirmed the $363 monthly alimony award because any analytical error was not prejudicial. The court also affirmed the award requiring Monte Connolly to pay one-half of Valerie’s attorney fees.
Holdings
- A party seeking alimony in a decree of dissolution following a decree of legal separation is not required to show a change in circumstances or good cause to modify the prior legal-separation decree. The court must instead determine a reasonable alimony award under the criteria in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-365.
- The district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding Valerie $363 per month in alimony for her lifetime or until remarriage.
- The district court did not abuse its discretion by ordering Monte to pay one-half of Valerie's attorney fees.
Questions Presented
- Whether an alimony award in a decree of dissolution following a decree of legal separation requires the recipient to show a change in circumstances under Nebraska law.
- Whether the amount of alimony awarded to Valerie was an abuse of discretion.
- Whether the district court abused its discretion in awarding Valerie one-half of her attorney fees.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- State v. Thompson, 294 Neb. 197, 881 N.W.2d 609 (2016)(followed)
- Stephens v. Stephens, 297 Neb. 188, 899 N.W.2d 582 (2017)(followed)
- Meints v. Meints, 258 Neb. 1017, 608 N.W.2d 564 (2000)(followed)
- Pendleton v. Pendleton, 242 Neb. 675, 496 N.W.2d 499 (1993)(followed)
- Emery v. Mangiameli, 218 Neb. 740, 359 N.W.2d 83 (1984)(followed)
- Marcovitz v. Rogers, 267 Neb. 456, 675 N.W.2d 132 (2004)(followed)
- Bowers v. Lens, 264 Neb. 465, 648 N.W.2d 294 (2002)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…