Nebraska Protective Services Unit, Inc., doing business as Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #88 v. State of Nebraska and Nebraska Association of Public Employees, Local 61 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (NAPE/AFSCME)

299 Neb. 797 (2018) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · April 26, 2018 · No. No. S-17-916

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the Commission of Industrial Relations' dismissal of a decertification petition filed by Nebraska Protective Services Unit, Inc. The court held that the petition was untimely under Commission rule 9(II)(C)(1), which required a public employee bargaining unit to file during the period preceding the statutorily required bargaining period when that period occurred earlier than the agreement-termination period.

Holdings

  1. Rule 9(II)(C)(1) permits filing within one of the two stated periods, but the phrase 'whichever is earlier' limits a particular party to the period that occurs earlier under the circumstances applicable to that party.
  2. Public employee bargaining units subject to the State Employees Collective Bargaining Act must file a decertification petition during the period preceding commencement of the statutorily required bargaining period in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-1379. NPSU's petition was time barred, so the CIR properly denied an election and dismissed the petition.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether NPSU timely filed its petition for decertification and certification under Rule 9(II)(C)(1) of the Rules of the Nebraska Commission of Industrial Relations.
  2. Whether the CIR erred by refusing to order an election.
  3. Whether the CIR erred by dismissing NPSU's petition.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (6)

  • In re Estate of Vollmann, 296 Neb. 659, 896 N.W.2d 576 (2017)(followed)
  • Melanie M. v. Winterer, 290 Neb. 764, 862 N.W.2d 76 (2015)(followed)
  • Douglas County Health Center Security Union v. Douglas County, 284 Neb. 109, 817 N.W.2d 250 (2012)(followed)
  • In re Petition of Golden Plains Services Transportation, 297 Neb. 105, 898 N.W.2d 670 (2017)(followed)
  • Liddell-Toney v. Department of Health & Human Services, 281 Neb. 532, 797 N.W.2d 28 (2011)(followed)
  • State v. Rask, 294 Neb. 612, 883 N.W.2d 688 (2016)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…