Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the Commission of Industrial Relations' dismissal of a decertification petition filed by Nebraska Protective Services Unit, Inc. The court held that the petition was untimely under Commission rule 9(II)(C)(1), which required a public employee bargaining unit to file during the period preceding the statutorily required bargaining period when that period occurred earlier than the agreement-termination period.
Holdings
- Rule 9(II)(C)(1) permits filing within one of the two stated periods, but the phrase 'whichever is earlier' limits a particular party to the period that occurs earlier under the circumstances applicable to that party.
- Public employee bargaining units subject to the State Employees Collective Bargaining Act must file a decertification petition during the period preceding commencement of the statutorily required bargaining period in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-1379. NPSU's petition was time barred, so the CIR properly denied an election and dismissed the petition.
Questions Presented
- Whether NPSU timely filed its petition for decertification and certification under Rule 9(II)(C)(1) of the Rules of the Nebraska Commission of Industrial Relations.
- Whether the CIR erred by refusing to order an election.
- Whether the CIR erred by dismissing NPSU's petition.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- In re Estate of Vollmann, 296 Neb. 659, 896 N.W.2d 576 (2017)(followed)
- Melanie M. v. Winterer, 290 Neb. 764, 862 N.W.2d 76 (2015)(followed)
- Douglas County Health Center Security Union v. Douglas County, 284 Neb. 109, 817 N.W.2d 250 (2012)(followed)
- In re Petition of Golden Plains Services Transportation, 297 Neb. 105, 898 N.W.2d 670 (2017)(followed)
- Liddell-Toney v. Department of Health & Human Services, 281 Neb. 532, 797 N.W.2d 28 (2011)(followed)
- State v. Rask, 294 Neb. 612, 883 N.W.2d 688 (2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…