Marissa Renee Blank v. Caleb Robert Blank

303 Neb. 602 (2019) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · July 12, 2019 · No. S-18-751

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed a district court decree dissolving the parties’ marriage and awarding joint legal and physical custody of their two children. The court held that the parties had reasonable notice and an opportunity to present evidence regarding joint custody, and it found no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that the case did not involve domestic intimate partner abuse requiring additional statutory findings. The court also upheld the determination that joint custody was in the children’s best interests.

Holdings

  1. The district court did not violate due process by awarding joint physical custody because the pleadings, proposed parenting plans, temporary-order motion, trial testimony, and closing arguments gave the parties reasonable notice that joint custody was at issue and an opportunity to present evidence.
  2. The record did not establish domestic intimate partner abuse under Nebraska law, so the district court was not required to make the special written findings required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2932(3).
  3. The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that joint physical custody was in the children's best interests.
  4. A trial court may assign final decisionmaking authority in particular areas to one parent while maintaining joint legal custody and the other parent's rights to consultation and participation.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court violated procedural due process by awarding joint physical custody without sufficient advance notice when neither party initially requested that specific arrangement.
  2. Whether the evidence established domestic intimate partner abuse requiring special written findings under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2932(3).
  3. Whether the district court abused its discretion in finding joint physical custody to be in the children's best interests.
  4. Whether the district court could divide final decisionmaking authority between the parents while awarding joint legal custody.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (13)

  • Erin W. v. Charissa W., 297 Neb. 143, 897 N.W.2d 858 (2017)(followed)
  • Whitesides v. Whitesides, 290 Neb. 116, 858 N.W.2d 858 (2015)(followed)
  • Fetherkile v. Fetherkile, 299 Neb. 76, 907 N.W.2d 275 (2018)(followed)
  • Zahl v. Zahl, 273 Neb. 1043, 736 N.W.2d 365 (2007)(distinguished)
  • Hill v. Hill, 20 Neb. Ct. App. 528, 827 N.W.2d 304 (2013)(distinguished)
  • Donald v. Donald, 296 Neb. 123, 892 N.W.2d 100 (2017)(followed)
  • Leners v. Leners, 302 Neb. 904, 925 N.W.2d 704 (2019)(followed)
  • State on behalf of Jakai C. v. Tiffany M., 292 Neb. 68, 871 N.W.2d 230 (2015)(followed)
  • Boyer v. Boyer, 24 Neb. Ct. App. 434, 889 N.W.2d 832 (2016)(followed)
  • State on behalf of Maddox S. v. Matthew E., 23 Neb. Ct. App. 500, 873 N.W.2d 208 (2016)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…