Gem City Bone and Joint, P.C. v. Michael W. Meister and Michael W. Meister, Attorney at Law, P.C., L.L.O.

306 Neb. 710 (2020) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · August 7, 2020 · No. No. S-19-849

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court considers whether an order denying motions to quash garnishment and vacate a registered Wyoming judgment was a final, appealable order. The court holds that the order affected a substantial right and that the appeal was properly before it. It further concludes that the Wyoming court lacked personal jurisdiction over Michael W. Meister individually because the relevant contacts were attributable only to his professional corporation, and it vacates the judgment against him individually.

Holdings

  1. An order denying a motion to quash a garnishment and vacate a registered foreign judgment is a final order under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1902(1)(c) because it is a postjudgment motion and affects a substantial right.
  2. Claim and issue preclusion did not bar Meister from challenging the Wyoming judgment's personal jurisdiction because the earlier and later rulings were successive orders in the same proceeding, not successive suits.
  3. The Wyoming court lacked personal jurisdiction over Meister individually because the record identified no actions taken by Meister personally that established constitutionally sufficient minimum contacts with Wyoming.
  4. The Nebraska order garnishing Meister's personal bank account had to be vacated because it was based on a Wyoming judgment that was void as to Meister individually.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Nebraska Supreme Court had appellate jurisdiction over the order denying Meister's motions to quash the garnishment and vacate the registered foreign judgment.
  2. Whether Meister was barred by claim or issue preclusion from challenging the Wyoming judgment's personal jurisdiction after failing to timely appeal the earlier Nebraska registration order.
  3. Whether the Wyoming court had personal jurisdiction over Meister individually under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  4. Whether the Nebraska garnishment order based on the registered Wyoming judgment had to be vacated.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (26)

  • Green v. Seiffert, 304 Neb. 212, 933 N.W.2d 590 (2019)(followed)
  • In re Adoption of Madysen S. et al., 293 Neb. 646, 879 N.W.2d 34 (2016)(followed)
  • Olson v. England, 206 Neb. 256, 292 N.W.2d 48 (1980)(discussed)
  • Repp v. Repp, 156 Neb. 45, 54 N.W.2d 238 (1952)(discussed)
  • Miller v. Steichen, 268 Neb. 328, 682 N.W.2d 702 (2004)(not reached)
  • Schroeder v. Homestead Corp., 163 Neb. 43, 77 N.W.2d 678 (1956)(distinguished)
  • Hara v. Reichert, 287 Neb. 577, 843 N.W.2d 812 (2014)(distinguished)
  • Deuth v. Ratigan, 256 Neb. 419, 590 N.W.2d 366 (1999)(followed)
  • Cattle National Bank & Trust Co. v. Watson, 293 Neb. 943, 880 N.W.2d 906 (2016)(followed)
  • Simms v. Friel, 302 Neb. 1, 921 N.W.2d 369 (2019)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 26.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…