Jones v. Jones

305 Neb. 615 (2020) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · April 23, 2020 · No. No. S-18-093

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court reviewed a custody-modification order involving the parties’ minor son. It held that the evidence of Mary Jones’s continuous unemployment and housing instability established a material change in circumstances affecting the child’s best interests, supporting modification of physical custody. The court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part the Court of Appeals’ decision, including issues concerning custody and child support worksheets.

Holdings

  1. Mary's continuous unemployment and chronic housing instability after the 2011 custody modification constituted a material change in circumstances affecting Kasey's best interests, even though the district court did not expressly make that finding.
  2. Awarding Curtis primary physical custody, subject to Mary's liberal parenting time, was in Kasey's best interests and was not an abuse of discretion.
  3. The absence of an express material-change finding in the district court's order was not dispositive because the appellate court could make the finding during de novo review when supported by the evidence.
  4. The record did not support the need for a safety plan restricting Mary's parenting time based on alcohol or narcotics use.
  5. Even in very low-income cases, a court awarding nominal child support under Neb. Ct. R. § 4-209 must attach an appropriate child-support worksheet; any deviation from the guideline minimum must be explained in the decree, order, or worksheet 5.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence established a material change in circumstances affecting Kasey's best interests sufficient to modify physical custody.
  2. Whether the modified custody and parenting-time arrangement awarding Curtis primary physical custody was in Kasey's best interests.
  3. Whether the parenting plan should retain a safety plan restricting Mary's parenting time based on alleged substance use.
  4. Whether an order awarding nominal child support must include a child-support worksheet and explain any deviation from guideline amounts.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (14)

  • VanSkiver v. VanSkiver, 303 Neb. 664, 930 N.W.2d 569 (2019)(followed)
  • State on behalf of Kaaden S. v. Jeffery T., 303 Neb. 933, 932 N.W.2d 692 (2019)(followed)
  • Whilde v. Whilde, 298 Neb. 473, 904 N.W.2d 695 (2017)(followed)
  • Hopkins v. Hopkins, 294 Neb. 417, 883 N.W.2d 363 (2016)(followed)
  • State on behalf of Jakai C. v. Tiffany M., 292 Neb. 68, 871 N.W.2d 230 (2015)(followed)
  • Schrag v. Spear, 290 Neb. 98, 858 N.W.2d 865 (2015)(followed)
  • Heistand v. Heistand, 267 Neb. 300, 673 N.W.2d 541 (2004)(followed)
  • Swenson v. Swenson, 254 Neb. 242, 575 N.W.2d 612 (1998)(followed)
  • Hoschar v. Hoschar, 220 Neb. 913, 374 N.W.2d 64 (1985)(limited)
  • Parker v. Parker, 234 Neb. 167, 449 N.W.2d 553 (1989)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…