Sanitary and Improvement District No. 67 of Sarpy County, Nebraska v. State of Nebraska Department of Roads and Sarpy County, Nebraska

309 Neb. 600 (2021) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · June 25, 2021 · No. No. S-20-659

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of an inverse condemnation action brought by Sanitary and Improvement District No. 67 against the Nebraska Department of Roads and Sarpy County. The court held that the sanitary and improvement district, as a political subdivision of Nebraska, was not a person holding private property for purposes of a takings claim against the State and therefore was not the real party in interest. The court also held that the defendants’ standing challenge was facial because it was raised at the pleadings stage without an evidentiary hearing or consideration of evidence outside the pleadings.

Holdings

  1. Because the standing challenge was made at the pleadings stage before an evidentiary hearing and before admission of evidence outside the pleadings, it was a facial challenge. SID No. 67 therefore had to establish standing through adequate factual allegations in its pleadings and was not entitled to offer or require consideration of extrinsic evidence.
  2. A sanitary and improvement district, as a political subdivision of Nebraska, is not a person having private property for purposes of the federal or Nebraska takings clauses and therefore is not the real party in interest in an inverse condemnation action against the State. The district consequently lacks standing to bring such an action.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court erred by refusing to consider evidence offered in opposition to a motion challenging SID No. 67's standing.
  2. Whether SID No. 67 was the real party in interest and had standing to bring an inverse condemnation action against the State for alleged taking or damaging of the district's property.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (33)

  • SID No. 1 v. Adamy, 289 Neb. 913, 858 N.W.2d 168 (2015)(followed)
  • Hollstein v. First Nat. Bank of Aurora, 231 Neb. 711, 437 N.W.2d 512 (1989)(followed)
  • Equestrian Ridge v. Equestrian Ridge Estates II, 308 Neb. 128, 953 N.W.2d 16 (2021)(followed)
  • Jacobs Engr. Group v. ConAgra Foods, 301 Neb. 38, 917 N.W.2d 435 (2018)(followed)
  • Ryan v. Streck, Inc., 309 Neb. 98, 958 N.W.2d 703 (2021)(followed)
  • Schaeffer v. Frakes, 306 Neb. 904, 947 N.W.2d 714 (2020)(followed)
  • Chaney v. Evnen, 307 Neb. 512, 949 N.W.2d 761 (2020)(followed)
  • Western Ethanol Co. v. Midwest Renewable Energy, 305 Neb. 1, 938 N.W.2d 329 (2020)(followed)
  • Valley Boys v. American Family Ins. Co., 306 Neb. 928, 947 N.W.2d 856 (2020)(followed)
  • Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, 588 U.S. 180, 139 S. Ct. 2162, 204 L. Ed. 2d 558 (2019)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 33.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…