Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of a legal malpractice action against an out-of-state attorney and law firm for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court held that the defendants’ representation of Nebraska clients concerning a federal housing program, without solicitation of Nebraska clients or other meaningful forum-directed conduct, did not establish sufficient minimum contacts. The location of the clients’ property and alleged injury in Nebraska was insufficient to support specific personal jurisdiction.
Holdings
- When a personal-jurisdiction hearing is limited to affidavits and accompanying exhibits, the appellate court reviews de novo whether the plaintiff established a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction and views factual conflicts in the plaintiff's favor.
- A Nebraska-based client does not, by itself, establish specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident attorney or law firm. Absent solicitation of Nebraska clients or another meaningful connection linking the attorney or firm to Nebraska, providing out-of-state legal representation concerning federal law is insufficient to constitute purposeful availment.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Nebraska courts had specific personal jurisdiction over an Illinois attorney and Maryland law firm based on their representation of Nebraska clients in a federal HUD matter.
- Whether the defendants' communications, billing, and work related to a Nebraska property established purposeful availment and sufficient minimum contacts with Nebraska.
- Whether the location of the alleged injury and the Nebraska clients' residence supplied the necessary connection for specific personal jurisdiction.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (23)
- Yeransian v. Willkie Farr, 305 Neb. 693, 942 N.W.2d 226 (2020)(followed)
- RFD-TV v. WildOpenWest Finance, 288 Neb. 318, 849 N.W.2d 107 (2014)(followed)
- Hand Cut Steaks Acquisitions v. Lone Star Steakhouse, 298 Neb. 705, 905 N.W.2d 644 (2018)(followed)
- Nimmer v. Giga Entertainment Media, 298 Neb. 630, 905 N.W.2d 523 (2018)(followed)
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297, 100 S. Ct. 559, 62 L. Ed. 2d 490 (1980)(followed)
- Williams v. Gould, Inc., 232 Neb. 862, 443 N.W.2d 577 (1989)(distinguished)
- Cape v. von Maur, 932 F. Supp. 124, 128 (D. Md. 1996)(followed)
- Sher v. Johnson, 911 F.2d 1357 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Kowalski v. Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, 787 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Mayes v. Leipziger, 674 F.2d 178 (2d Cir. 1982)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 23.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…