Richard J. K. v. State, Division of Child & Family Services

118 Nev. 737 (2002) · Supreme Court of Nevada · December 3, 2002

Summary

The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the termination of Richard J.K.’s parental rights. The court held that clear and convincing evidence supported the children’s best interests and established parental unfitness and failure of parental adjustment based on Richard’s violent criminal conduct, notwithstanding his incarceration. The court emphasized that incarceration was not the sole basis for termination.

Holdings

  1. The district court properly found by clear and convincing evidence that termination of Richard's parental rights was in the children's best interests.
  2. The district court properly found parental unfitness by clear and convincing evidence based on Richard's violent felony convictions and the resulting inability to provide adequate care and control for the children's physical, mental, and emotional health and development.
  3. The district court properly found failure of parental adjustment and did not rely solely on Richard's incarceration as grounds for termination.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether clear and convincing evidence established that termination of Richard's parental rights was in the children's best interests.
  2. Whether clear and convincing evidence established parental fault through parental unfitness and failure of parental adjustment.
  3. Whether Richard's incarceration was improperly treated as the sole basis for terminating his parental rights.
  4. Whether the district court's termination judgment was supported by substantial evidence.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (9)

  • Matter of Parental Rights as to Q.L.R., 118 Nev. 602, 54 P.3d 56 (2002)(followed and distinguished)
  • Matter of Parental Rights as to J.L.N., 118 Nev. 621, 55 P.3d 955 (2002)(followed and distinguished)
  • Matter of Parental Rights as to N.J., 116 Nev. 790, 8 P.3d 126 (2000)(followed)
  • Smith v. Smith, 102 Nev. 263, 720 P.2d 1219 (1986)(followed as quoted)
  • Drury v. Lang, 105 Nev. 430, 776 P.2d 843 (1989)(followed as quoted)
  • Kobinski v. State, 103 Nev. 293, 738 P.2d 895 (1987)(followed as quoted)
  • Matter of Parental Rights as to C.J.M., 118 Nev. 724, 58 P.3d 188 (2002)(analogized)
  • Champagne v. Welfare Division, 100 Nev. 640, 691 P.2d 849 (1984)(limited by later authority)
  • Matter of Parental Rights of Montgomery, 112 Nev. 719, 917 P.2d 949 (1996)(followed as quoted)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…