Summary
The Nevada Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from an order appointing a successor interim receiver for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The court held that NRAP 3A(b)(4), which permits appeals from orders appointing or refusing to appoint a receiver, does not authorize an appeal from an order appointing a successor receiver.
Holdings
- NRAP 3A(b)(4) does not permit an appeal from a district court order appointing a successor receiver.
- Because no other statute or court rule appeared to authorize an appeal from the challenged order, the Supreme Court of Nevada lacked jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether NRAP 3A(b)(4), which permits an appeal from an order appointing or refusing to appoint a receiver, authorizes an appeal from an order appointing a successor receiver.
- Whether any other statute or court rule authorized appellate jurisdiction over the order appointing the successor receiver.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Yonker Constr., Inc. v. Hulme, 126 Nev. 590, 592, 248 P.3d 313, 314 (2010)(followed)
- City & Cty. of San Francisco v. Shers, 46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 57 (Ct. App. 1995)(followed by analogy)
- Swate v. Johnston, 981 S.W.2d 923, 925 (Tex. App. 1998)(followed by analogy)
- State v. Superior Ct. of Spokane Cty., 34 P. 431 (1893)(followed by analogy)
- Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…