Summary
The Supreme Court of Nevada held that arbitration provisions in a home purchase agreement and limited warranty were unconscionable as applied to the homeowners' construction-defect claims. The provisions were procedurally unconscionable because they were not sufficiently conspicuous or explained, and substantively unconscionable because they imposed arbitration costs and purported to waive protections and remedies under NRS Chapter 40. The court granted mandamus relief and directed the district court to vacate its order compelling arbitration.
Cases Cited (0)
No outbound citations extracted.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…