Summary
The New Hampshire Supreme Court held that Old Still Road was a class VI public highway established by prescription under RSA 229:1. It affirmed the determination that the public had used the road adversely and continuously for the requisite period. The court upheld Fortin & Redmond Associates’ entitlement to damages arising from a wrongful injunction but vacated the amount awarded and remanded for recalculation; it also affirmed the denial of attorney’s fees.
Holdings
- Old Still Road was established as a public highway by prescription because the public used it continuously and adversely, without interruption and under a claim of right, for at least twenty years before January 1, 1968.
- RSA 229:1 does not require proof of use during the specific twenty-year period from January 1, 1948, through January 1, 1968; continuous adverse use could have begun earlier, so long as a twenty-year period was completed before January 1, 1968.
- A party subject to a wrongfully issued injunction may recover damages caused by the injunction, and Fortin & Redmond was entitled to pursue such damages.
- The trial court improperly calculated damages by arbitrarily awarding one-half of one month's total company expenses. Recoverable damages must be specifically attributable to the interruption, necessary, incurred during a reasonable adjustment period, and not avoidable through reasonable efforts.
- Fortin & Redmond was not entitled to attorney's fees because the Mahoneys' position was not patently unreasonable.
Questions Presented
- Whether Old Still Road was established as a class VI public highway by prescription under RSA 229:1.
- Whether RSA 229:1 required proof of public use specifically during the period from January 1, 1948, through January 1, 1968.
- Whether Fortin & Redmond was entitled to damages caused by the injunction and whether the trial court properly calculated those damages.
- Whether Fortin & Redmond was entitled to an award of attorney's fees.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (15)
- Blagbrough v. Town of Wilton, 145 N.H. 118, 124 (2000)(applied)
- Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 509-10(applied)
- Wason v. Nashua, 85 N.H. 192, 198 (1931)(cited)
- Town of Warren v. Shortt, 139 N.H. 240, 242-43(applied)
- Sandford v. Town of Wolfeboro, 143 N.H. 481, 485-86(applied)
- Williams v. Babcock, 116 N.H. 819, 822-24 (1976)(applied)
- Leo Foundation v. State, 117 N.H. 209, 212 (1977)(applied)
- Cross v. Brown, 148 N.H. 485, 486 (2002)(applied)
- Blake v. Hickey, 93 N.H. 318 (1945)(cited)
- Windham v. Jubinville, 92 N.H. 102 (1942)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…