Mahoney v. Town of Canterbury

150 N.H. 148 (2003) · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · October 14, 2003

Summary

The New Hampshire Supreme Court held that Old Still Road was a class VI public highway established by prescription under RSA 229:1. It affirmed the determination that the public had used the road adversely and continuously for the requisite period. The court upheld Fortin & Redmond Associates’ entitlement to damages arising from a wrongful injunction but vacated the amount awarded and remanded for recalculation; it also affirmed the denial of attorney’s fees.

Holdings

  1. Old Still Road was established as a public highway by prescription because the public used it continuously and adversely, without interruption and under a claim of right, for at least twenty years before January 1, 1968.
  2. RSA 229:1 does not require proof of use during the specific twenty-year period from January 1, 1948, through January 1, 1968; continuous adverse use could have begun earlier, so long as a twenty-year period was completed before January 1, 1968.
  3. A party subject to a wrongfully issued injunction may recover damages caused by the injunction, and Fortin & Redmond was entitled to pursue such damages.
  4. The trial court improperly calculated damages by arbitrarily awarding one-half of one month's total company expenses. Recoverable damages must be specifically attributable to the interruption, necessary, incurred during a reasonable adjustment period, and not avoidable through reasonable efforts.
  5. Fortin & Redmond was not entitled to attorney's fees because the Mahoneys' position was not patently unreasonable.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Old Still Road was established as a class VI public highway by prescription under RSA 229:1.
  2. Whether RSA 229:1 required proof of public use specifically during the period from January 1, 1948, through January 1, 1968.
  3. Whether Fortin & Redmond was entitled to damages caused by the injunction and whether the trial court properly calculated those damages.
  4. Whether Fortin & Redmond was entitled to an award of attorney's fees.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (15)

  • Blagbrough v. Town of Wilton, 145 N.H. 118, 124 (2000)(applied)
  • Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 509-10(applied)
  • Wason v. Nashua, 85 N.H. 192, 198 (1931)(cited)
  • Town of Warren v. Shortt, 139 N.H. 240, 242-43(applied)
  • Sandford v. Town of Wolfeboro, 143 N.H. 481, 485-86(applied)
  • Williams v. Babcock, 116 N.H. 819, 822-24 (1976)(applied)
  • Leo Foundation v. State, 117 N.H. 209, 212 (1977)(applied)
  • Cross v. Brown, 148 N.H. 485, 486 (2002)(applied)
  • Blake v. Hickey, 93 N.H. 318 (1945)(cited)
  • Windham v. Jubinville, 92 N.H. 102 (1942)(cited)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…