Summary
The New Hampshire Supreme Court held that a property owner selling his own property was exempt from the New Hampshire Real Estate Practices Act under RSA 331-A:4, I. The exemption applied even though the owner allegedly held himself out as a licensed real estate broker. Accordingly, the New Hampshire Real Estate Commission lacked subject matter jurisdiction to conduct a disciplinary hearing concerning the transaction.
Holdings
- RSA 331-A:4, I, plainly exempts a property owner from the New Hampshire Real Estate Practices Act with respect to property owned by that owner, including when the owner holds himself out as a real estate broker.
- RSA 331-A:28, I, does not authorize the Commission to impose discipline on a property owner selling the owner's own property because RSA 331-A:4, I, excludes that transaction from the Act's provisions.
- The Commission lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hold a disciplinary hearing on the buyers' complaint because Robinson was exempt from the Act while selling his own property.
Questions Presented
- Whether the New Hampshire Real Estate Commission had subject matter jurisdiction to hold a disciplinary hearing concerning an owner's sale of property the owner personally owned.
- Whether the property-owner exemption in RSA 331-A:4, I, applies even when the owner holds himself out as a real estate broker.
- Whether RSA 331-A:28, I, authorized the Commission to impose discipline despite the property-owner exemption.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (5)
- In re Juvenile 2001-0169, 151 N.H. 706, 707 (2005)(followed)
- Blackthorne Group v. Pines of Newmarket, 150 N.H. 804, 806 (2004)(followed)
- Finlay Commercial Real Estate v. Paino, 133 N.H. 4, 7 (1990)(followed)
- Chase v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., 155 N.H. 19, 22 (2007)(followed)
- Silva v. Botsch, 120 N.H. 600, 602 (1980)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…