Kenneth England v. Maria Brianas

166 N.H. 369 (2014) · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · June 18, 2014 · No. Grafton No. 2013-206

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire affirmed dismissal of Kenneth England’s negligence action against Maria Brianas after her former intimate partner stabbed England in Brianas’s home. The court held that Brianas did not owe England a duty to warn or protect him because the alleged conduct did not make the assault sufficiently foreseeable and no special relationship or circumstances imposed such a duty.

Holdings

  1. Private persons generally have no duty to protect others from the criminal acts of third parties, although a duty may arise in limited circumstances involving a special relationship or sufficiently foreseeable criminal misconduct.
  2. Brianas's knowledge that Bryson was upset, left an angry telephone message, used profanities, and appeared to follow her was legally insufficient to make his attack on England foreseeable or to impose a duty to warn England.
  3. Dismissal was proper because the pleadings failed to establish the duty element of negligence.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Brianas owed England a legal duty to warn or protect him from Bryson's criminal assault based on the alleged circumstances.
  2. Whether the pleaded facts established a special relationship or special circumstances sufficient to overcome the general rule that private persons have no duty to protect others from criminal acts of third parties.
  3. Whether the Superior Court properly dismissed the negligence action.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Plaisted v. LaBrie, 165 N.H. 194, 195 (2013)(followed)
  • Ford v. N.H. Department of Transportation, 163 N.H. 284, 288 (2012)(followed)
  • Signal Aviation Services v. City of Lebanon, 164 N.H. 578, 582 (2013)(followed)
  • Pesaturo v. Kinne, 161 N.H. 550, 557 (2011)(followed)
  • Carignan v. N.H. International Speedway, 151 N.H. 409, 412 (2004)(followed)
  • Walls v. Oxford Management Co., 137 N.H. 653, 656-57 (1993)(followed)
  • Remsburg v. Docusearch, 149 N.H. 148, 154-55 (2003)(applied by analogy)
  • Dupont v. Aavid Thermal Technologies, 147 N.H. 706, 708, 713-14 (2002)(distinguished)
  • Iannelli v. Burger King Corp., 145 N.H. 190, 194 (2001)(followed)
  • Marquay v. Eno, 139 N.H. 708, 717-18 (1995)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…