In the Matter of Robert S. Fisher, an Attorney at Law

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey imposed reciprocal discipline on Robert S. Fisher based on disciplinary action in Pennsylvania. The court suspended Fisher from practicing law in New Jersey for two years, retroactive to September 19, 2006, conditioned reinstatement on his reinstatement in Pennsylvania and proof of mental fitness, and imposed related compliance and cost requirements.

Holdings

1. Fisher should be suspended from the practice of law in New Jersey for two years under the reciprocal-discipline procedure because the conduct underlying his Pennsylvania discipline constituted violations of New Jersey's Rules of Professional Conduct.
2. The two-year suspension is retroactive to September 19, 2006, and Fisher may not be reinstated in New Jersey until he is reinstated in Pennsylvania and submits approved proof of mental fitness to practice.
3. Fisher must continue complying with Rule 1:20-20, including its affidavit-of-compliance requirement, and must reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual prosecution expenses.

Questions Presented

1. Whether reciprocal discipline should be imposed based on the discipline imposed on Fisher in Pennsylvania.
2. What duration and conditions should govern Fisher's suspension and any future reinstatement in New Jersey.

Disposition

other