State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement Association v. Longacre

133 N.M. 20 (N.M. 2002) · Supreme Court of New Mexico · November 19, 2002 · No. No. 27,135

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Mexico held that NMSA 1978, § 10-11-4.2(A), which limits recovery of retirement-benefit overpayments to those made within one year before discovery, is constitutional. The court characterized the provision as a statute of repose rather than a legislative forgiveness or diminishment of an obligation owed to the state under Article IV, Section 32 of the New Mexico Constitution. The court reversed the Court of Appeals and remanded for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. Section 10-11-4.2(A) is constitutional because it bars the remedy of recovering certain overpayments after the statutory period but does not release, diminish, or extinguish the underlying obligation or liability owed to the state.
  2. A statute must be analyzed under Article IV, Section 32 from the point at which it releases or diminishes a fixed liability or obligation, not merely from the statute's enactment date.
  3. Section 10-11-4.2(A) is a statute of repose that begins to run when each overpayment is made, rather than when PERA discovers the error causing the overpayment.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether NMSA 1978, Section 10-11-4.2(A), which limits PERA's recovery of overpayments to those made during the year preceding discovery of the error or omission, violates Article IV, Section 32 of the New Mexico Constitution.
  2. Whether Section 10-11-4.2(A) is a constitutional statute of repose rather than an unconstitutional legislative release or diminution of a liability owed to the state.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (21)

  • State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement Ass'n v. Longacre, 2001-NMCA-076, 131 N.M. 156, 33 P.3d 906(reversed)
  • City of Albuquerque v. One (1) 1984 White Chevy Ut., 2002-NMSC-014, 132 N.M. 187, 46 P.3d 94(followed)
  • Asplund v. Alarid, 29 N.M. 129, 219 P. 786 (1923)(followed)
  • Ortiz v. Taxation & Revenue Department, 1998-NMCA-027, 124 N.M. 677, 954 P.2d 109(followed)
  • City of Farmington v. Fawcett, 114 N.M. 537, 843 P.2d 839 (Ct. App. 1992)(followed)
  • Board of Education v. McRae, 29 N.M. 85, 218 P. 346 (1923)(followed)
  • State v. Montoya, 32 N.M. 314, 255 P. 634 (1927)(followed and distinguished)
  • Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 99 N.M. 333, 657 P.2d 1182 (1983)(followed)
  • Jones v. Burns, 138 Mont. 268, 357 P.2d 22 (1960)(followed)
  • Alabama Education Ass'n v. Grayson, 382 So. 2d 501 (Ala. 1980)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…