Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department reversed an order granting defendants summary judgment in a personal-injury action arising from a patio umbrella striking the plaintiff. The court held that conflicting evidence regarding defendants' practice of removing umbrellas on windy days created a triable issue of fact as to whether the accident was foreseeable and whether defendants' conduct constituted actionable negligence.
Holdings
- Defendants were not entitled to summary judgment because plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact concerning whether the accident was foreseeable.
- Plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether defendants' failure to secure the patio umbrella constituted actionable negligence.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendants were entitled to summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff's accident was not foreseeable.
- Whether plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether defendants' failure to secure the patio umbrella constituted actionable negligence.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (3)
- Kelly v. Berberich, 36 A.D.3d 475, 477 (1st Dep't 2007)(followed)
- Barr v. Incorporated Vil. of Atl. Beach, 278 A.D.2d 188, 188 (2d Dep't 2000)(followed)
- Conlon v. Becksmad Assoc., 5 A.D.3d 286, 286-287 (1st Dep't 2004)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.