Matter of C. X.-E. B.

2026 NY Slip Op 00307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York First Department 2026) · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department · January 27, 2026 · No. Docket No. B-05193/22; Appeal No. 5678; Case No. 2024-06292

Summary

The New York Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed an order terminating the respondent mother's parental rights based on permanent neglect and transferring custody and guardianship for adoption. The court held that the mother's evidentiary challenge to the agency's progress notes was unpreserved and, in any event, that the notes were properly admitted under the CPLR business-records exception; it also rejected her ineffective-assistance claim.

Holdings

  1. The court deemed the appeal taken from the final order terminating the mother's parental rights because the final order contained identical findings of fact and disposition as the order from which the appeal was noticed.
  2. The mother's claim that the agency's progress notes were not properly certified was unpreserved and the court declined to review it.
  3. Family Court Act § 1046(a)(iv), which governs article 10 proceedings, does not apply to termination of parental rights proceedings under Social Services Law § 384-b; CPLR 4518(a)'s business-record exception controls.
  4. The mother's ineffective-assistance claim was unavailing.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appeal noticed from an earlier order could be deemed taken from the later final order terminating parental rights when the two orders contained identical findings and disposition.
  2. Whether the agency's progress notes were inadmissible because they were not certified under Family Court Act § 1046(a)(iv).
  3. Whether Family Court Act § 1046(a)(iv), rather than CPLR 4518(a), governs admission of agency progress notes in a termination of parental rights proceeding under Social Services Law § 384-b.
  4. Whether counsel's failure to object to admission of the progress notes constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (4)

  • Matter of Samantha M. [Allison Y.], 112 AD3d 421, 422 (1st Dept 2013)(followed)
  • Matter of Nevaeh N. [Heidi O.], 220 AD3d 1070, 1072 (3d Dept 2023), lv denied 41 NY3d 903 (2024)(followed)
  • Matter of Shirley A.S. [David A.S.], 90 AD3d 1655, 1655 (4th Dept 2011), lv denied 18 NY3d 811 (2012)(followed)
  • Matter of Judith L.C. v. Lawrence Y., 179 AD3d 616, 617 (1st Dept 2020), lv denied 35 NY3d 911 (2020)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…