Matter of AN.D. (A.D., J.A.)

2026 NY Slip Op 01156 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Department · March 3, 2026 · No. NN-10336-38/21, NN-10340-42/21; Appeal Nos. 5976, 5976A; Case No. 2024-06827

Summary

The Appellate Division, First Department, unanimously affirmed a Family Court finding that the respondent father neglected the subject children, including through educational neglect and unsanitary living conditions. The court dismissed as moot the appeal concerning the children's temporary placement in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services because the placement terms had expired.

Holdings

  1. Family Court did not err by sua sponte conforming the pleadings to the proof of educational neglect because the father had a full and fair opportunity to address the amended allegations.
  2. The evidence established educational neglect of L.D., J.D., and An.D. by a preponderance of the evidence.
  3. The father's educational neglect of L.D., J.D., and An.D. established a fundamental defect in his understanding of parental duties sufficient to support derivative neglect of the other three school-aged children.
  4. The evidence supported a neglect finding because the unsanitary conditions and failure to provide adequate clothing and hygiene care threatened the children's physical, mental, and emotional health and reflected a failure to provide a minimum degree of care.
  5. The appeal from the portion of the dispositional order placing the children in the Commissioner's custody until the next permanency hearing was moot because the placement terms had expired.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Family Court properly conformed the pleadings sua sponte to the proof of educational neglect presented at the fact-finding hearing.
  2. Whether the evidence established educational neglect by a preponderance of the evidence.
  3. Whether the father's educational neglect supported a finding of derivative neglect as to the other school-aged children.
  4. Whether the evidence of unsanitary home conditions and inadequate care established neglect under the Family Court Act.
  5. Whether the appeal from the temporary placement portion of the dispositional order was moot because the placement terms had expired.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (10)

  • Matter of Ne-Ashia R. [Na-Ashia R.], 99 AD3d 616, 616 [1st Dept 2012](followed)
  • Matter of Kyeley V. [Antoinette V.], 160 AD3d 468, 468 [1st Dept 2018](followed)
  • Matter of Ashley S. [Rebecca S.-C.], 157 AD3d 536, 537 [1st Dept 2018](followed)
  • Matter of Angelos F. [Leonidas F.], 156 AD3d 506, 506 [1st Dept 2017](followed)
  • Matter of Ivania L.V. [Liz C.], 139 AD3d 542, 543 [1st Dept 2016](followed)
  • Matter of Corine G. [William G.], 135 AD3d 443, 443 [1st Dept 2016](followed)
  • Matter of Cerenity F. [Jennifer W.], 160 AD3d 540, 541 [1st Dept 2018](followed)
  • Matter of Adena I. [Claude I.], 91 AD3d 484, 484 [2012](followed)
  • Matter of T.R. [Jaquasia G.], 227 AD3d 530, 530 [1st Dept 2024](followed)
  • Matter of Romeo C. [Perla P.], 222 AD3d 473, 474 [1st Dept 2023](followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…