Summary
The court affirmed a summary judgment awarding a partner $264,473.92 as its share of proceeds from the disposition of mortgages. It held that defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact and that prejudgment interest was properly awarded under CPLR 5001 because the action involved a specified share of funds wrongfully withheld.
Holdings
- Defendants' unsubstantiated allegations and submissions lacking sufficient evidentiary proof did not raise an issue of fact; summary judgment for plaintiff was properly granted.
- Under the partnership agreement, plaintiff was entitled to a share of the proceeds from disposition of the mortgages proportionate to its partnership interest, not merely reimbursement of its contribution.
- An accounting was not required because the action was at law, the proceeds arose from a discrete transaction, the funds were held in one account, and plaintiff's specific share was ascertainable.
- The award of prejudgment interest at the statutory rate of nine percent was proper under CPLR 5001.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendants submitted sufficient evidentiary proof to raise a triable issue of fact and defeat plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
- Whether the partnership agreement entitled plaintiff to a proportionate share of the mortgage-disposition proceeds rather than merely reimbursement of its contribution.
- Whether plaintiff's action required an accounting of the partnership before recovery could be awarded.
- Whether prejudgment interest at the statutory rate of nine percent was properly awarded under CPLR 5001.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557(followed)
- Non-Linear Trading Co. v. Braddis Assocs., 243 A.D.2d 107, 115(followed)
- Kriegsman v. Kraus, Ostreicher & Co., 126 A.D.2d 489, 490(followed)
- Aurnou v. Greenspan, 161 A.D.2d 438, 439-440, amended on other grounds, 164 A.D.2d 794(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…