Green Thumb Lawn Care, Inc. v. Iwanowicz

107 A.D.3d 1402 (4th Dep't 2013) · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department · June 7, 2013

Summary

The court upheld an administrative determination that Green Thumb Lawn Care, Inc. and its president violated New York pesticide-application statutes and regulations by failing to provide contracts specifying the total cost and approximate application dates. It also held that blanket waivers of application-date notice were impermissible. The court vacated the lower court’s declaratory judgment because no justiciable controversy remained and affirmed dismissal of a challenge to a DEC policy as unripe.

Holdings

  1. The Acting Commissioner's determination was not arbitrary or capricious because the petitioners' agreement omitted the total price and specified application-date ranges that were not approximate, and the blanket waiver theory was inconsistent with the statute's purpose and text.
  2. Declaratory relief was improper because no justiciable controversy remained concerning the 2002 consent order, and the requests regarding unidentified future consumers presented hypothetical issues.
  3. The challenge was not ripe because the DEC had not applied the 2005 policy to petitioners' determination and petitioners had suffered no actual, concrete injury that further administrative action could not prevent or ameliorate.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Acting Commissioner's determination that petitioners violated ECL 33-1001 and 6 NYCRR 325.40 was arbitrary and capricious or lacked a rational basis.
  2. Whether the petitioners were entitled to declaratory relief concerning a 2002 consent order and their ability to obtain waivers of notice of pesticide-application dates.
  3. Whether the petitioners' challenge to the DEC's 2005 policy statement was ripe for judicial review.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (10)

  • Matter of Concetta T. Cerame Irrevocable Family Trust v. Town of Perinton Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 6 A.D.3d 1091, 1092 (3d Dep't 2004)(followed)
  • Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ. of Union Free Sch. Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, 34 N.Y.2d 222, 231 (1974)(followed)
  • Matter of Lighthouse Pointe Prop. Assoc. LLC v. New York State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, 14 N.Y.3d 161, 176 (2010)(followed)
  • Matter of New York State Superfund Coalition, Inc. v. New York State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, 18 N.Y.3d 289, 296 (2011)(followed)
  • Long Is. Light. Co. v. Allianz Underwriters Ins. Co., 35 A.D.3d 253, 253 (1st Dep't 2006), appeal dismissed, 9 N.Y.3d 1003 (2007)(followed)
  • Ramunno v. Skydeck Corp., 30 A.D.3d 1074, 1074 (4th Dep't 2006)(followed)
  • Matter of United Water New Rochelle v. City of New York, 275 A.D.2d 464, 466 (2d Dep't 2000)(followed)
  • Megibow v. Condominium Bd. of Kips Bay Towers Condominium, Inc., 38 A.D.3d 265, 266 (1st Dep't 2007)(followed)
  • Matter of County of Niagara v. Dairies, 79 A.D.3d 1702, 1704 (4th Dep't 2010), leave denied, 17 N.Y.3d 703 (2011)(followed)
  • Matter of Best Payphones, Inc. v. Department of Info. Tech. & Telecom. of City of N.Y., 5 N.Y.3d 30, 34 (2005), reargument denied, 5 N.Y.3d 824 (2005)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…