Summary
The Appellate Division held that the father failed to establish a change in circumstances requiring modification of the existing custody arrangement. It concluded that the Family Court lacked a sound and substantial basis for awarding the father sole legal and residential custody because it insufficiently considered the children’s stability, their relocation, the strained father-child relationship, and one child’s stated preference to remain with the mother.
Holdings
- A party seeking modification of an existing custody arrangement must show a change in circumstances such that modification is required to ensure the continued best interests of the child.
- The Family Court's determination awarding the father sole legal and residential custody lacked a sound and substantial basis in the record and could not be upheld.
Questions Presented
- Whether the father established a change in circumstances requiring modification of the existing custody arrangement to ensure the children's continued best interests.
- Whether the Family Court's custody determination had a sound and substantial basis in the record.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (8)
- Matter of Sparacio v Fitzgerald, 73 A.D.3d 790, 790-791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)(followed)
- Matter of Russell v Russell, 72 A.D.3d 973, 974-975 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)(followed)
- Trinagel v Boyar, 70 A.D.3d 816, 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)(followed)
- Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 171 (N.Y. 1982)(followed)
- Matter of Ross v Ross, 96 A.D.3d 856, 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)(followed)
- Matter of Moran v Cortez, 85 A.D.3d 795, 796-797 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)(followed)
- Matter of Marrero v Centeno, 71 A.D.3d 771, 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)(followed)
- Sano v Sano, 98 A.D.3d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…