Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed the defendant's judgment of conviction for conspiracy in the fourth degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, entered upon his guilty plea. The court held that assigned counsel's Anders brief was sufficient, found no nonfrivolous appellate issues upon independent review, and granted counsel's motion to withdraw.
Holdings
- Under the circumstances of this case, assigned counsel's Anders brief was sufficient because it addressed the essential issues, and the omission of an analysis of the validity and enforceability of the defendant's appeal waiver made no practical difference to the Anders outcome.
- The record contained no nonfrivolous issue that could be raised on appeal.
- Assigned counsel's application for leave to withdraw was granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether assigned appellate counsel's Anders brief adequately addressed the essential issues despite failing to analyze the validity and enforceability of defendant's waiver of the right to appeal.
- Whether the record contained any nonfrivolous issue that could be raised on appeal.
- Whether assigned counsel should be permitted to withdraw under Anders.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738(followed)
- People v. Morris, 187 A.D.3d 938, 939(followed)
- People v. Warney, 186 A.D.3d 1273(followed)
- People v. Murray, 169 A.D.3d 227, 233(followed)
- Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252(followed)
- People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…