Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed an order awarding the paternal grandmother sole custody of two children and granting the mother limited visitation and telephone contact. The court held that extended disruption of custody and the grandmother’s established relationship with and care for the children supported a finding of extraordinary circumstances. It further concluded that the custody and visitation arrangement served the children’s best interests.
Holdings
- Extraordinary circumstances existed because the children had experienced an extended disruption of custody, had resided with the grandmother for more than two years, and the mother had voluntarily failed to reassert her parental role or meaningfully participate in their care.
- The children's best interests were served by continuing their residence with the grandmother and allowing the mother limited visitation and regular telephone contact rather than joint legal custody or overnight visitation.
- The court assumed, without deciding, that the mother had demonstrated the required material change in circumstances because no party raised the issue, and it proceeded to the best-interests question.
Questions Presented
- Whether extraordinary circumstances existed permitting the paternal grandmother to retain custody over the mother's superior parental right.
- Whether the children's best interests supported continuing sole custody with the grandmother rather than granting the mother joint legal custody or overnight visitation.
- Whether the mother's request to modify the existing custody order required a showing of a material change in circumstances.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 544 (1976)(followed)
- Matter of Mercado v. Mercado, 64 A.D.3d 951, 952 (2009)(followed)
- Matter of McDevitt v. Stimpson, 281 A.D.2d 860, 861 (2001)(followed)
- Matter of Carton v. Grimm, 51 A.D.3d 1111, 1112 n., 1113 (2008), lv. denied, 10 N.Y.3d 716 (2008)(followed)
- Matter of Coonradt v. Aussicker, 66 A.D.3d 1143, 1143-1144 (2009)(followed)
- Matter of Gale v. Gray, 39 A.D.3d 903, 904-905 (2007)(followed in part)
- Matter of Bohigian v. Johnson, 48 A.D.3d 904, 905-906 (2008)(followed)
- Matter of VanDee v. Bean, 66 A.D.3d 1253, 1254-1255 (2009)(followed)
- Matter of Howard v. McLoughlin, 64 A.D.3d 1147, 1148 (2009)(followed)
- Matter of Olds v. Binyard, 64 A.D.3d 658, 659 (2009)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…