Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed an order modifying the mother's visitation schedule but denying her request for entirely unsupervised visitation. The court held that the mother's progress in addressing substance abuse and related issues established a change in circumstances, but that her history of relapse supported Family Court's determination that continued supervision was in the children's best interests.
Holdings
- The record supported a finding that the mother had demonstrated a change in circumstances through her participation in substance-abuse counseling, improved mental health, employment, and acquisition of an apartment, warranting inquiry into the children's best interests.
- Family Court properly denied the mother's request for entirely unsupervised visitation because the mother's history of substance-abuse relapse and the testimony concerning continued substance-abuse-related behavior supported a flexible visitation order that proceeded gradually and served the children's best interests.
- Family Court's decision was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record and would not be disturbed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the mother established a change in circumstances warranting review of the children's best interests and modification of the existing visitation order.
- Whether Family Court properly denied the mother's request that all visitation be unsupervised.
- Whether Family Court's credibility determinations and visitation schedule lacked a sound and substantial basis in the record.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (17)
- Matter of Leighann W. v Thomas X., 141 A.D.3d 876, 877 (2016)(followed)
- Matter of Schlegel v Kropf, 132 A.D.3d 1181, 1182 (2015)(followed)
- Matter of Sparbanie v Redder, 130 A.D.3d 1172, 1173 (2015)(followed)
- Matter of Chris X. v Jeanette Y., 124 A.D.3d 1013, 1014 (2015)(followed)
- Matter of Maziejka v Fennelly, 3 A.D.3d 748, 749 (2004)(followed)
- Matter of La Scola v Litz, 258 A.D.2d 792, 792 (1999)(followed)
- Matter of Swett v Balcom, 64 A.D.3d 934, 935-936 (2009)(followed)
- Tait v Tait, 44 A.D.3d 1142, 1143 (2007)(followed)
- Matter of Raychelle J. v Kendell K., 121 A.D.3d 1206, 1207-1208 (2014)(followed)
- Matter of Vanita UU. v Mahender VV., 130 A.D.3d 1161, 1165 (2015)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…