Summary
The Appellate Division, Third Department held that a public library chartered as an education corporation was not a "public agency" under Labor Law § 230(3). Accordingly, a cleaning-services contract with the library was not subject to the prevailing-wage provisions of Labor Law article 9, and the Commissioner of Labor's determination was annulled.
Holdings
- The notice of hearing was legally sufficient because it cited Labor Law § 235, identified the article 9 prevailing-wage investigation, described the public-building-service contract, and apprised petitioners of the charges sufficiently to prepare a defense.
- The library was not a public agency within the meaning of Labor Law § 230 (3), notwithstanding its public purpose, school-district charter, elected trustees, and tax-based funding.
- The contract was not subject to the prevailing-wage provisions of Labor Law article 9 because the library was not a public agency covered by Labor Law § 230 (3).
- The request for declaratory relief was not authorized in a proceeding transferred to the Appellate Division under CPLR 7804 (g); that portion of the matter had to be severed and remitted to Supreme Court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Department of Labor's notice of hearing was jurisdictionally defective because it did not expressly state that the library was a public agency or identify the employee complaint as the basis for the investigation.
- Whether a public library chartered as an education corporation is a public agency within the meaning of Labor Law § 230 (3) and therefore subject to the prevailing-wage requirements of Labor Law article 9.
- Whether the contract for cleaning and janitorial services was subject to Labor Law article 9.
- Whether the declaratory-judgment claim could be adjudicated in the CPLR 7804 (g) proceeding.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (17)
- Matter of D & D Mason Contrs., Inc. v Smith, 81 AD3d 943, 943 (2011), lv denied 17 NY3d 714 (2011)(followed)
- Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323, 333 (1988)(followed)
- Matter of Zlotnick v City of Saratoga Springs, 122 AD3d 1210, 1211-1212 (2014)(followed)
- De La Cruz v Caddell Dry Dock & Repair Co., Inc., 21 NY3d 530, 535 (2013)(followed)
- Matter of New York Charter School Assn. v Smith, 15 NY3d 403, 407, 409-412 (2010)(followed)
- Matter of Murphy's Disposal Servs., Inc. v Gardner, 103 AD3d 1015, 1016 (2013)(followed)
- Matter of M.G.M. Insulation, Inc. v Gardner, 20 NY3d 469, 474-475 (2013)(followed)
- Bucci v Village of Port Chester, 22 NY2d 195, 201 (1968)(followed)
- Matter of Beers v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 262 AD2d 315, 315-316 (1999)(followed)
- Matter of New York Pub. Lib. v New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd., 45 AD2d 271, 283 (1974), affd 37 NY2d 752 (1975)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…