Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed the Workers' Compensation Board's denial of death benefits arising from the decedent's COVID-19 infection. The court held that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that the claimant failed to establish a specific workplace exposure or a prevalence of COVID-19 in the decedent's work environment sufficient to show that the death arose out of and in the course of employment.
Holdings
- The contraction of COVID-19 in the workplace reasonably qualifies as an unusual hazard, rather than the natural and unavoidable result of employment, and therefore may be compensable under the Workers' Compensation Law.
- The claimant failed to meet her burden of demonstrating that the decedent contracted COVID-19 in the course of his employment because she offered no evidence of a specific workplace exposure or of COVID-19 prevalence in the group home or among relevant coworkers before or contemporaneously with symptom onset.
- The Board's determination disallowing the claim was supported by substantial evidence and would not be disturbed.
- The Board did not act arbitrarily and capriciously because the cases cited by the claimant were factually distinguishable.
Questions Presented
- Whether the claimant established that the decedent contracted COVID-19 in the course of his employment so as to qualify for workers' compensation death benefits.
- Whether substantial evidence supported the Workers' Compensation Board's determination that the death was not causally related to employment.
- Whether the Board acted arbitrarily and capriciously by failing to follow its own precedent.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (13)
- Matter of Pierre v ABF Frgt., 211 AD3d 1284, 1285 [3d Dept 2022](followed)
- Matter of Leon v Monadnock Constr. Inc., 208 AD3d 1415, 1415 [3d Dept 2022](followed)
- Matter of Minichino v Amazon.com DEDC LLC, 204 AD3d 1289, 1291 [3d Dept 2022](followed)
- Matter of De La Cruz v Aufiero Painting Indus. Inc., 185 AD3d 1330, 1330 [3d Dept 2020](followed)
- Employer: Southern Glazer's Wine, 2022 WL 4397485, *6, 2022 NY Wrk Comp LEXIS G2335750, *___ [WCB No. G233 5750, Sept. 20, 2022](followed)
- Employer: Long Island DDSO, 2022 WL 594590, *5, 2022 NY Wrk Comp LEXIS 933, *12-13 [WCB No. G233 5526, Feb. 16, 2022](followed)
- Employer: Manhattan Psychiatric Center, 2021 WL 5748736, *5, 2021 NY Wrk Comp LEXIS 5600, *11 [WCB No. G281 3814, Nov. 29, 2021](followed)
- Employer: DOCCS Edgecombe Cor Facility, 2020 WL 7231882, *3-4, 2020 NY Wrk Comp LEXIS 15519, *9-10 [WCB No. G271 8395, Dec. 1, 2020](followed)
- Matter of Gaspard v Queens Party Hall Inc., 189 AD3d 1880, 1881 [3d Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 912 [2021](followed)
- Employer: All Metro Healthcare Aids Inc., 2022 WL 1125058, *3-5, 2022 NY Wrk Comp LEXIS 1982, *8-10 [WCB No. G233 6997, April 6, 2022](distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…