Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order dismissing a Family Court Act article 8 family offense petition. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case based on allegations actually charged in the petition.
Holdings
- The petitioner failed to establish prima facie that the respondent committed a family offense based on allegations actually charged in the petition.
- The Family Court properly granted the respondent's motion to dismiss and dismissed the petition.
Questions Presented
- Whether the petitioner established a prima facie family offense under Family Court Act article 8 based on conduct charged in the petition.
- Whether the Family Court properly granted the respondent's motion to dismiss at the close of the petitioner's case.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Matter of Stibrany v. Lamprea, 229 AD3d 557(followed)
- Matter of Prince v. Ford, 195 AD3d 724(followed)
- Matter of Brown v. Brown, 127 AD3d 969(followed)
- Matter of Czop v. Czop, 21 AD3d 958(followed)
- Matter of Bessent v. Bessent, 113 AD3d 847(followed)
- Matter of Ungar v. Ungar, 80 AD3d 771(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…