Summary
The Appellate Division, Third Department reversed an order denying Joseph Fowler's CPL article 440 motion to vacate his judgment of conviction without a hearing. The court held that the County Court failed to address the People's argument that Fowler's jurisdictional challenge to the superior court information was procedurally barred under CPL 440.10 (3) (c), and remitted the matter for consideration of that issue.
Holdings
- The Appellate Division could not determine the procedural-bar issue because its review power does not extend to issues not ruled upon by the trial court. The matter therefore had to be remitted to County Court for consideration of the issue.
- Procedural bars to relief under CPL 440.10 are applicable to claims alleging jurisdictional defects.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Appellate Division could decide the People's argument that defendant's jurisdictional challenge was procedurally barred under CPL 440.10(3)(c) when County Court had not ruled on that argument.
- Whether procedural bars under CPL 440.10 apply to claims alleging jurisdictional defects.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (4)
- People v LaFontaine, 92 NY2d 470, 473-474 [1998](followed)
- People v Regan, 196 AD3d 735, 742 [3d Dept 2021], revd on other grounds 39 NY3d 459 [2023](followed)
- People v Drayton, 189 AD3d 1888, 1892 [3d Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 1119 [2021](followed)
- People v Cuadrado, 9 NY3d 362, 365 [2007](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…