Summary
The Appellate Division, Third Department affirmed a Workers' Compensation Board decision establishing a claim for a traumatic brain injury sustained by a county caseworker at work. The court held that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that a workplace accident occurred and that the employer failed to rebut the presumption that the injury arose out of employment under Workers' Compensation Law § 21(1).
Holdings
- The Board's finding that claimant sustained a workplace accident was supported by substantial evidence and therefore would not be disturbed.
- The employer failed to present substantial evidence sufficient to overcome the Workers' Compensation Law § 21 (1) presumption that claimant's accidental injury arose out of his employment.
Questions Presented
- Whether substantial evidence supported the Workers' Compensation Board's finding that claimant sustained an accidental injury at work.
- Whether the employer rebutted the presumption under Workers' Compensation Law § 21 (1) that an accident and injury occurring during employment arose out of the employment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- Matter of Zobel v Chemung County, 136 AD3d 1140, 1140 [3d Dept 2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 907 [2016](followed)
- Matter of Silvestri v New York City Tr. Auth., 153 AD3d 1069, 1071 [3d Dept 2017](followed)
- Matter of Ellis v Frito Lay Inc., 138 AD3d 1363, 1363-1364 [3d Dept 2016](followed)
- Matter of Klamka v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc., 84 AD3d 1527, 1528 [3d Dept 2011](followed)
- Matter of Buccinna v Pembroke Cent. Sch. Dist., 165 AD3d 1369, 1370-1371 [3d Dept 2018](followed)
- Matter of Thompson v Genesee County Sheriff's Dept., 43 AD3d 1252, 1253-1254 [3d Dept 2007](followed)
- Matter of Keevins v Farmingdale UFSD, 304 AD2d 1013, 1014 [3d Dept 2003](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…