Matter of Esther J. v. Christopher K.

2026 NY Slip Op 02176 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department · April 9, 2026 · No. CV-24-1070

Summary

The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed a Family Court order continuing joint physical custody and allocating certain decision-making authority between the parents. The court held that the communication breakdown constituted a change in circumstances but did not make joint custody unworkable, while reminding Family Court to protect the confidentiality of information disclosed during a Lincoln hearing.

Holdings

  1. The breakdown in communication affecting the child's medical needs and social relationships constituted a change in circumstances sufficient to trigger a best-interests analysis.
  2. The communication breakdown did not make joint physical custody unworkable, and Family Court properly continued joint physical custody on the weekly schedule.
  3. Family Court may consider information shared by a child during a Lincoln hearing, but the child's expressed preferences must remain confidential and may not be disclosed in the court's written order.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the parents' communication problems constituted a change in circumstances requiring a best-interests analysis.
  2. Whether the breakdown in communication made continued joint physical custody unworkable and required modification of the custody arrangement.
  3. Whether Family Court improperly disclosed the child's preferences from the Lincoln hearing in its written order.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Matter of Sheena PP. v Edward QQ., 238 AD3d 1417, 1418 [3d Dept 2025](followed)
  • Matter of Patricia Y. v Justin X., 219 AD3d 1586, 1587 [3d Dept 2023](followed)
  • Matter of Michael YY. v Teresa ZZ., 242 AD3d 1343, 1344-1345 [3d Dept 2025](followed)
  • Matter of Joseph L. v Heather K., 214 AD3d 1041, 1043 [3d Dept 2023](followed)
  • Matter of Michelle EE. v John EE., 235 AD3d 1121, 1124 [3d Dept 2025](followed)
  • Matter of Steven OO. v Amber PP., 227 AD3d 1154, 1156 [3d Dept 2024](followed)
  • Matter of Brooke PP. v Joshua QQ., 240 AD3d 1047, 1049 [3d Dept 2025](followed)
  • Matter of Henry CC. v Antoinette DD., 222 AD3d 1231, 1233 [3d Dept 2023](followed)
  • Matter of Joseph E. v Crystal G., 233 AD3d 1285, 1286 n 3 [3d Dept 2024](followed)
  • Matter of Christie BB. v Isaiah CC., 194 AD3d 1130, 1133 [3d Dept 2021](followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…