Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed a Family Court order continuing joint physical custody and allocating certain decision-making authority between the parents. The court held that the communication breakdown constituted a change in circumstances but did not make joint custody unworkable, while reminding Family Court to protect the confidentiality of information disclosed during a Lincoln hearing.
Holdings
- The breakdown in communication affecting the child's medical needs and social relationships constituted a change in circumstances sufficient to trigger a best-interests analysis.
- The communication breakdown did not make joint physical custody unworkable, and Family Court properly continued joint physical custody on the weekly schedule.
- Family Court may consider information shared by a child during a Lincoln hearing, but the child's expressed preferences must remain confidential and may not be disclosed in the court's written order.
Questions Presented
- Whether the parents' communication problems constituted a change in circumstances requiring a best-interests analysis.
- Whether the breakdown in communication made continued joint physical custody unworkable and required modification of the custody arrangement.
- Whether Family Court improperly disclosed the child's preferences from the Lincoln hearing in its written order.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (14)
- Matter of Sheena PP. v Edward QQ., 238 AD3d 1417, 1418 [3d Dept 2025](followed)
- Matter of Patricia Y. v Justin X., 219 AD3d 1586, 1587 [3d Dept 2023](followed)
- Matter of Michael YY. v Teresa ZZ., 242 AD3d 1343, 1344-1345 [3d Dept 2025](followed)
- Matter of Joseph L. v Heather K., 214 AD3d 1041, 1043 [3d Dept 2023](followed)
- Matter of Michelle EE. v John EE., 235 AD3d 1121, 1124 [3d Dept 2025](followed)
- Matter of Steven OO. v Amber PP., 227 AD3d 1154, 1156 [3d Dept 2024](followed)
- Matter of Brooke PP. v Joshua QQ., 240 AD3d 1047, 1049 [3d Dept 2025](followed)
- Matter of Henry CC. v Antoinette DD., 222 AD3d 1231, 1233 [3d Dept 2023](followed)
- Matter of Joseph E. v Crystal G., 233 AD3d 1285, 1286 n 3 [3d Dept 2024](followed)
- Matter of Christie BB. v Isaiah CC., 194 AD3d 1130, 1133 [3d Dept 2021](followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…