Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Third Department dismissed as moot the paternal grandmother's appeal from a permanency hearing order continuing the placement of the subject child in foster care and the permanency goal of reunification. The court held that subsequent permanency hearing orders rendered the appeal moot and that no exception to the mootness doctrine applied.
Holdings
- The appeal was rendered moot because two subsequent permanency hearing orders continued the child's placement and the permanency goal of reunification.
- The exception to the mootness doctrine did not apply under the circumstances of this case.
Questions Presented
- Whether the grandmother's appeal from the permanency hearing order was rendered moot by the issuance of two subsequent permanency hearing orders continuing the child's placement and the reunification goal.
- Whether an exception to the mootness doctrine applied despite the subsequent orders.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Matter of Kimberly G. [Natasha G.], 203 AD3d 1418, 1419 [3d Dept 2022](followed)
- Matter of Jihad N. [Devine. N.], 180 AD3d 1164, 1165 [3d Dept 2020](followed)
- Matter of Tyler I. [Shawn I.], 219 AD3d 1097, 1099 [3d Dept 2023](followed)
- Matter of Cheyeanne E. [Scott E.], 154 AD3d 1206, 1207 [3d Dept 2017](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…