Summary
The New York Court of Appeals held that Labor Law § 241 (6) does not apply to injuries arising from building maintenance work performed outside the context of construction, demolition, or excavation. Because the plaintiff was injured while conducting a routine two-year elevator safety inspection, his claim based on an Industrial Code slipping-hazard provision was not covered by the statute.
Holdings
- Labor Law § 241 (6) does not apply to claims arising from building or structure maintenance performed outside the construction, demolition, or excavation context.
- The Industrial Code's inclusion of maintenance within the definition of construction work must be construed consistently with Labor Law § 241 (6)'s limitation to the construction, demolition, and excavation context; it does not extend the statute to unrelated routine maintenance.
Questions Presented
- Whether an employee injured while performing a two-year elevator safety inspection may recover under Labor Law § 241 (6).
- Whether the Industrial Code definition of construction work, which includes maintenance, extends Labor Law § 241 (6) to maintenance work unrelated to construction, demolition, or excavation.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Allen v. Cloutier Constr. Corp., 44 N.Y.2d 290 (1978)(followed)
- Iuliani v. Great Neck Sewer Dist., 38 N.Y.2d 885 (1976)(followed)
- Rusin v. Jackson Hts. Shopping Ctr., 27 N.Y.2d 103 (1970)(followed)
- Joblon v. Solow, 91 N.Y.2d 457 (1998)(followed)
- Page v. State of New York, 56 N.Y.2d 604 (1982)(followed)
- Mosher v. State of New York, 80 N.Y.2d 286 (1992)(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…