Summary
The New York Court of Appeals holds that CPLR 205(a), the statutory savings provision, is available only to the original plaintiff in a dismissed action, or in the specified circumstances to the plaintiff's executor or administrator. Because HSBC Bank USA, as trustee, was not the same plaintiff as the certificateholders who commenced the prior action, it could not invoke CPLR 205(a) to revive its otherwise time-barred claims against DB Structured Products. The Court affirms dismissal of the action.
Holdings
- CPLR 205(a) permits a new action only when brought by the same plaintiff that prosecuted the original action, subject to the statute's limited exception for an executor or administrator when the original plaintiff dies and the cause of action survives.
- HSBC was not the original plaintiff and could not invoke CPLR 205(a) to save its untimely complaint.
- The remedial purpose of CPLR 205(a) does not overcome the statute's identity-of-plaintiff limitation.
Questions Presented
- Whether CPLR 205(a) permits a new action by HSBC, as trustee, when the prior action was commenced by different certificateholder entities.
- Whether HSBC may invoke the savings statute on the theory that it sought to enforce the same rights or the rights of the same trust as the prior plaintiffs.
- Whether the statutory exception for executors and administrators supports extending CPLR 205(a) to a trustee or other entity different from the original plaintiff.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (17)
- ACE Securities Corp., Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SL2 v. DB Structured Products, Inc., 25 NY3d 581(followed)
- Reliance Ins. Co. v. PolyVision Corp., 9 NY3d 52, 57-58(followed)
- George v. Mt. Sinai Hosp., 47 NY2d 170, 175, 177, 179(followed)
- Streeter v. Graham & Norton Co., 263 NY 39, 43-44(followed)
- Carrick v. Central Gen. Hosp., 51 NY2d 242, 249, 252(followed)
- Matter of Marian T. (Lauren R.), 36 NY3d 44, 49(followed)
- Matter of Lemma v. Nassau County Police Officer Indem. Bd., 31 NY3d 523, 528(followed)
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Cent. School Dist., 91 NY2d 577, 583, 587(followed)
- Town of Aurora v. Village of E. Aurora, 32 NY3d 366, 372-373(followed)
- Matter of Town of Riverhead v. New York State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs., 5 NY3d 36, 43(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…