Summary
This case considers whether a wife who was not personally served in a foreclosure action can maintain an action to protect her inchoate right of dower during her husband's lifetime. The court holds that the wife has a right to redeem the mortgaged premises to protect her inchoate dower interest, distinguishing prior case law. The judgment is affirmed.
Holdings
- A wife who was not personally served in a mortgage foreclosure has an inchoate right of dower that gives her the right to maintain an action to redeem the premises during her husband's lifetime.
Questions Presented
- Whether a wife who was not served in a mortgage foreclosure can maintain an action to redeem the premises based on her inchoate right of dower during her husband's lifetime.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- White v. Coulter, 59 N.Y. 629(cited)
- Mills v. Van Voorhies, 20 N.Y. 412(cited)
- Simar v. Canaday, 53 N.Y. 298(cited)
- Witthaus v. Schack, 105 N.Y. 332, 11 N.E. Rep. 649(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…