Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed an order granting Luis Gavilanes summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240(1) and denying defendants' cross-motion to dismiss that claim. The court held that the evidence established defendants' negligence and a proximate causal connection to the plaintiff's accident, and it rejected challenges concerning translated evidence and the availability of a ladder.
Holdings
- Plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on liability because the evidence established that defendants' negligence resulted in a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) and was a proximate cause of plaintiff's accident and injury.
- The proponent of translated evidence bears the burden of demonstrating that the translation was provided by a competent, objective interpreter and was accurate; professional qualifications and competence in both languages generally suffice, but attestations merely stating fluency without other credentials were inadequate.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240(1).
- Whether defendants were entitled to dismissal of plaintiff's Labor Law § 240(1) claim.
- Whether translated evidence was properly supported by translator attestations demonstrating competent and accurate translation.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Nava-Juarez v. Moshulu Fieldston Realty, LLC, 167 A.D.3d 511, 512 (1st Dep't 2018)(followed)
- National Puerto Rican Day Parade, Inc. v. Casa Publs., Inc., 79 A.D.3d 592, 594 (1st Dep't 2010)(followed)
- Hoffman v. SJP TS, LLC, 111 A.D.3d 467, 467 (1st Dep't 2013)(followed)
- Ortiz v. City of New York, 224 A.D.3d 631, 631-32 (1st Dep't 2024)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…