Matter of Mackey v. Mennin

Mackey, 2026 NY Slip Op 03072 (Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division First Department 2026) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Department · May 14, 2026 · No. Motion No. M-1948; Appeal No. 6650; Case No. 2026-01529

Summary

The Appellate Division, First Department denied Lashawn Mackey's application for relief under article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules and dismissed the petition without costs or disbursements. The court also denied the motion for a stay.

Court
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Writing for the Court
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P.; Kennedy, J.; Friedman, J.; Gesmer, J.; Rosado, J.
Jurisdiction
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
Decision date
May 14, 2026
Docket number
Motion No. M-1948; Appeal No. 6650; Case No. 2026-01529
Procedural posture
Petitioner presented an application to the Appellate Division pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules and separately moved for a stay.
Precedential value
Published intermediate appellate decision
Parties
Lashawn Mackey v. Felicia Anne Mennin, Alvin L. Bragg, Jr.
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate procedurecivil procedureremedies

Practice areas

Civil procedureAppellate procedureRemedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the petitioner's article 78 application should be granted.
  2. Whether the motion for a stay should be granted.

Holdings

  1. The Appellate Division denied the application and dismissed the petition.
  2. The motion for a stay was denied.

Key quotations

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. (*1)

Factual background

The opinion does not set out the underlying facts or the nature of the challenged governmental action. It records only that Lashawn Mackey presented an article 78 application to the Appellate Division and sought a stay.

Procedural history

The opinion contains no description of proceedings in a lower court. The Appellate Division denied the article 78 application, dismissed the petition without costs or disbursements, and denied the motion for a stay.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…