Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department, unanimously affirmed a judgment of foreclosure and sale and dismissed as subsumed an appeal from an order denying Carlos Valdez's motion to vacate a default judgment or file a late answer. The court held that the plaintiff's affidavits established proper service under CPLR 308(2), and that Valdez failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his default.
Holdings
- The plaintiff's affidavits of service constituted prima facie evidence of proper service, and Valdez failed to rebut the showing of service at his residence.
- Valdez failed to establish a reasonable excuse for his default because he did not rebut plaintiff's showing of proper service.
- The appeal from the order denying Valdez's motion was dismissed as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment of foreclosure and sale.
Questions Presented
- Whether Valdez rebutted the affidavits of service and established that he was not properly served under CPLR 308(2).
- Whether Valdez demonstrated a reasonable excuse for his default sufficient to vacate the default judgment.
- Whether the appeal from the order denying vacatur was subsumed in the appeal from the judgment of foreclosure and sale.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Ali, 180 A.D.3d 591, 591 (1st Dep't 2020), leave dismissed, 36 N.Y.3d 1046 (2021)(followed)
- Johnson v. Deas, 32 A.D.3d 253, 254 (1st Dep't 2006)(followed)
- HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Gifford, 224 A.D.3d 447, 450 (1st Dep't 2024)(followed)
- Nationstar Mtge., LLC v. Kamil, 155 A.D.3d 966, 967 (2d Dep't 2017)(followed)
- PEP LLC v. Channel Creations LLC, 217 A.D.3d 591, 592 (1st Dep't 2023)(followed)
- Citibank, N.A. v. K.L.P. Sportswear, Inc., 144 A.D.3d 475, 476 (1st Dep't 2016)(followed)
- Lopez v. Mama's Fried Chicken, Inc., 202 A.D.3d 597, 598 (1st Dep't 2022)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…