Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed an order adjudicating Dasheim Greene a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act. The court upheld the assessment of risk-factor points and declined to grant a downward departure.
Holdings
- The assessment of 30 points under risk factor 3 was proper because clear and convincing evidence established that defendant victimized three young girls by sexually exploiting them for his personal gain.
- The assessment of points under risk factor 7 was proper because the evidence clearly established that defendant at least promoted the relationship for purposes of victimization, regardless of the circumstances under which the parties met.
- The SORA court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure, and defendant provided no basis for the Appellate Division to exercise its own discretion to grant one.
Questions Presented
- Whether the assessment of 30 points under SORA risk factor 3 was supported by clear and convincing evidence.
- Whether points were properly assessed under SORA risk factor 7 based on defendant's relationship with the victims.
- Whether the SORA court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request for a downward departure.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- People v. Torres, 220 AD3d 514 (1st Dept 2023), lv denied 41 NY3d 908 (2024)(followed)
- People v. Brunson, 154 AD3d 499, 499 (1st Dept 2017), lv denied 30 NY3d 908 (2018)(followed)
- People v. Cook, 29 NY3d 121, 126 (2017)(followed)
- People v. Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 (2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…