Qiaoshang Intl. LLC v. Bryant Park Funding 100, LLC

2026 NY Slip Op 02221 (Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division First Department 2026) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Department · April 14, 2026 · No. Index Nos. 651888/23, 153489/21; Appeal No. 6362; Case No. 2025-00647

Summary

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed a judgment cancelling Bryant Park Funding 100, LLC's mortgage on two condominium units and granting plaintiffs summary judgment. The court held that plaintiffs had an interest in the units and that the mortgagee had actual or constructive notice of that interest, defeating bona fide encumbrancer status. The court also upheld specific performance against the development entities and rejected the mortgagee's request for additional discovery.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiffs were entitled to summary judgment cancelling BPF's mortgage because they established an interest in the units, BPF knew which units Qiaoshang sought to acquire, and BPF had actual or constructive notice of that interest before taking and recording the mortgage.
  2. HFZ waived the requirement that Qiaoshang deliver a conversion notice.
  3. Specific performance was properly granted against HFZ because its control over the direct owner of the units gave it the power to effectuate specific performance.
  4. Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment notwithstanding BPF's request for additional discovery.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiffs established an interest in the condominium units sufficient to defeat BPF's status as a bona fide encumbrancer when BPF took and recorded its mortgage.
  2. Whether HFZ waived the contractual requirement that Qiaoshang deliver a conversion notice.
  3. Whether specific performance could be ordered against HFZ-affiliated entities that indirectly controlled the direct owner of the units.
  4. Whether Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment despite BPF's request for additional discovery under CPLR 3212(f).

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (4)

  • Warwick St Partners LLC v Harris, 200 AD3d 586, 587 [1st Dept 2021], lv dismissed 38 NY3d 1168 [2022](followed)
  • Condor Funding, LLC v 176 Broadway Owners Corp., 147 AD3d 409, 411 [1st Dept 2017](followed)
  • 75 Christopher St. Corp. v Furman, 138 AD2d 323, 323-324 [1st Dept 1988](followed)
  • 2386 Creston Ave. Realty, LLC v M-P-M Mgt. Corp., 58 AD3d 158, 163 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 716 [2009](followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…