Summary
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department dismissed a father's appeal from an order terminating his parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect and freeing the child for adoption. The court held that the father's challenges concerned a finding of permanent neglect entered on consent, which was beyond appellate review, while noting that the validity of the consent could be challenged through a motion to vacate or withdraw consent.
Holdings
- An appeal challenging a permanent-neglect finding entered on the respondent father's consent must be dismissed because the finding is beyond appellate review.
- A party may challenge whether consent to a permanent-neglect finding was given knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently by preserving the contention through a motion to vacate the finding or withdraw consent.
Questions Presented
- Whether the father's appeal challenging the permanent-neglect finding could be reviewed when that finding was entered on his consent.
- Whether a party may challenge the validity of consent to a permanent-neglect finding by preserving the issue through a motion to vacate the finding or withdraw consent.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (6)
- Matter of Raymond H. [Dana C.], 186 AD3d 1125, 1126 (4th Dept 2020)(followed)
- Matter of Aiden T. [Melissa S.], 164 AD3d 1663, 1665 (4th Dept 2018), lv denied 32 NY3d 917 (2019)(followed)
- Matter of Bryan W., 299 AD2d 929, 930 (4th Dept 2002), lv denied 99 NY2d 506 (2003)(followed)
- Matter of Abigail H. [Daniel D.], 172 AD3d 1922, 1923 (4th Dept 2019), lv denied 34 NY3d 901 (2019)(followed)
- Matter of Dah' Marii G. [Cassandra G.], 156 AD3d 1479, 1480 (4th Dept 2017)(followed)
- Matter of Xavier O.V. [Sabino V.], 117 AD3d 1567, 1567 (4th Dept 2014), lv denied 24 NY3d 903 (2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…