Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed the dismissal of Denise Casares's amended complaint, which sought damages for mental anguish arising from the Village of Westbury's removal of a tree. The court held that the complaint did not assert a viable negligent infliction of emotional distress claim and failed to allege negligence sufficient to state a cause of action under CPLR 3211(a)(7).
Holdings
- The amended complaint did not assert a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress, which generally requires a breach of a duty that unreasonably endangered the plaintiff's physical safety or caused the plaintiff to fear for the plaintiff's own safety.
- Dismissal of the amended complaint under CPLR 3211(a)(7) was proper because the complaint failed to allege negligence and therefore failed to state a cause of action.
Questions Presented
- Whether the amended complaint stated a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress or another cognizable claim.
- Whether dismissal under CPLR 3211(a)(7) was proper because the amended complaint failed to allege negligence and therefore failed to state a cause of action.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Weinstein v. Levitin, 208 A.D.3d 531, 532(followed)
- Gruber v. Donaldsons, Inc., 201 A.D.3d 887, 888-889(followed)
- Clevenger v. Yuzek, 222 A.D.3d 931, 934(followed)
- Connaughton v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 N.Y.3d 137, 142(followed)
- Wedgewood Care Ctr., Inc. v. Kravitz, 198 A.D.3d 124, 130(followed)
- Borrerro v. Haks Group, Inc., 165 A.D.3d 1216, 1219(followed)
- Sacino v. Warwick Val. Cent. Sch. Dist., 138 A.D.3d 717, 719(followed)
- Davydov v. Youssefi, 205 A.D.3d 881, 884(followed)
- Trayvilla v. Japan Airlines, 178 A.D.3d 746, 747(followed)
- Whitfield v. Law Enforcement Empls. Benevolent Assn., 237 A.D.3d 1139(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…