Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order modifying a prior custody arrangement to award the father residential custody of the parties' younger child. The court held that a change in circumstances supported the modification and emphasized the child's stated preference, the child's relationships with each parent, and the Family Court's credibility determinations.
Holdings
- The appeal from the portion of the order awarding the father residential custody of the older child was dismissed as academic because the child had reached age 18.
- A custody order may be modified upon a subsequent change in circumstances when modification is necessary to protect the child's best interests; the Family Court properly found that this standard was satisfied.
- The Family Court properly awarded the father residential custody of the younger child because the determination was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record and was consistent with the child's best interests.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Family Court properly found a change in circumstances warranting modification of the existing custody arrangement.
- Whether transferring residential custody of the younger child to the father served the child's best interests.
- Whether the appeal concerning residential custody of the older child remained justiciable after the child reached age 18.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Matter of Greenfield v Mender, 244 AD3d 1120, 1121(followed)
- Matter of Stone v Weinberg, 216 AD3d 1171, 1173(followed)
- Matter of Currie v Follini, 209 AD3d 649, 650(followed)
- Matter of Langenau v Hargrove, 198 AD3d 650, 651-652(followed)
- Matter of Newton v McFarlane, 174 AD3d 67, 83(followed)
- Matter of DeVita v DeVita, 143 AD3d 981, 982-983(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…