Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed Maurice Hennegan’s convictions for murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. The court held that the legal-sufficiency claim was unpreserved and, in any event, supported by legally sufficient evidence; it also rejected challenges concerning the weight of the evidence, substitution of counsel, and the sentence.
Holdings
- Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence because he did not specify at trial the grounds asserted on appeal.
- Even if considered, the evidence was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree beyond a reasonable doubt.
- The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence.
- Defendant's pretrial pro se written letter requesting substitution of counsel, standing alone, did not require the trial court to relieve assigned counsel.
- Defendant abandoned his request for substitution of counsel by declining to provide further reasons and expressing no further dissatisfaction with defense counsel.
- The sentence imposed was not excessive.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendant preserved his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.
- Whether the evidence was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Whether the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.
- Whether the trial court erred by declining to substitute assigned counsel based solely on defendant's pretrial pro se written request.
- Whether defendant abandoned his request for substitution of counsel by declining to explain his reasons and expressing no further dissatisfaction with counsel.
- Whether the sentence imposed was excessive.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (12)
- People v. Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 492(followed)
- People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620(followed)
- People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349(followed)
- People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348(followed)
- People v. Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410(followed)
- People v. Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495(followed)
- People v. Romero, 7 NY3d 633, 643-644(followed)
- People v. Porto, 16 NY3d 93, 100(followed)
- People v. Mendoza, 239 AD3d 773, 773-774(followed)
- People v. Molina, 208 AD3d 1641, 1642-1643(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…