Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the denial of the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240(1). Although the plaintiff’s testimony and corroborating evidence established a prima facie case, defendants’ expert affidavits raised a triable issue of fact concerning whether the accident occurred as described.
Holdings
- Plaintiff established a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law through his testimony and corroborating witness testimony, but partial summary judgment was properly denied because defendants raised a triable issue of fact concerning the manner in which the accident occurred.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff was entitled to partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240(1) based on his account of an accident involving a rail that broke or gave way and caused him to fall down a shaft.
- Whether defendants' expert evidence created a triable issue of fact regarding whether the accident occurred in the manner plaintiff described.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Alonzo v. Safe Harbors of the Hudson Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc., 104 A.D.3d 446, 449-450 (1st Dep't 2013)(applied)
- Cassidy v. Highrise Hoisting & Scaffolding, Inc., 89 A.D.3d 510, 510-511 (1st Dep't 2011)(applied)
- Vargas v. Sabri, 115 A.D.3d 505 (1st Dep't 2014)(applied)
- Valentine v. Grossman, 283 A.D.2d 571, 573 (2d Dep't 2001)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…