Matter of Edwin R. v. Maria G.

2019 NY Slip Op 06717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Department · September 24, 2019 · No. 9880

Summary

The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed a Family Court order awarding the father sole legal and physical custody of the children and continuing the mother's visitation by mutual agreement. The court held that the hearing evidence supported the custody award, that the visitation arrangement was permissible, and that the Family Court properly limited testimony from the mother's child life specialist.

Holdings

  1. The custody award to the father was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the hearing evidence and was properly affirmed.
  2. The order continuing the mother's visitation as mutually agreed upon was not improper on the record presented.
  3. Family Court properly declined to allow the child life specialist to testify in a professional capacity about the mother's changes because the witness was not an expert and could not opine on the mother's parental fitness.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the hearing evidence provided a sound and substantial basis for awarding the father sole legal and physical custody.
  2. Whether visitation may properly continue as mutually agreed upon by the parties despite the mother's contention that the parties could not work together.
  3. Whether Family Court properly precluded a child life specialist from testifying in a professional capacity about the mother's changes and parental fitness.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (6)

  • Matter of James Joseph M. v. Rosana R., 32 A.D.3d 725, 726 (1st Dep't 2006), lv. denied, 7 N.Y.3d 717 (2006)(followed)
  • Matter of Samuel v. Sowers, 162 A.D.3d 674, 675 (2d Dep't 2018)(followed)
  • Matter of Alleyne v. Cochran, 119 A.D.3d 1100, 1101-1102 (3d Dep't 2014)(followed)
  • Matter of Sara B., 41 A.D.3d 170, 171 (1st Dep't 2007)(followed)
  • Matter of Painter v. Painter, 211 A.D.2d 993, 995 (3d Dep't 1995)(not followed)
  • Matter of Thomson v. Battle, 99 A.D.3d 804, 806 (2d Dep't 2012)(not followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…