Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the denial of a mother's motion to vacate her default in a permanent neglect proceeding. The court held that she failed to provide a reasonable excuse for her nonappearance or establish a meritorious defense, and that the evidence supported termination of her parental rights as being in the children's best interests.
Holdings
- Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother's motion to vacate the default because she failed to establish a reasonable excuse for her failure to attend the hearing.
- The mother failed to establish a meritorious defense to the allegations of permanent neglect.
- The preponderance of the evidence supported the finding that termination of the mother's parental rights was in the children's best interests.
Questions Presented
- Whether Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother's motion to vacate the default entered in the permanent-neglect proceeding.
- Whether the mother established a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear.
- Whether the mother established a meritorious defense to the allegations of permanent neglect.
- Whether the preponderance of the evidence supported termination of the mother's parental rights as being in the children's best interests.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Matter of Derrick T., 261 AD2d 108 [1st Dept 1999](followed)
- Matter of Ilyas Zaire A.-R. [Habiba A.-R.], 104 AD3d 512 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 859 [2013](followed)
- Matter of Janaya T. [Sarah T.], 165 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2018](followed)
- Matter of Tyshawn S. [Shana S.], 143 AD3d 990 [2d Dept 2016](followed)
- Matter of Angel P., 44 AD3d 448, 449 [1st Dept 2007](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…